Record-Keeping & Retention Requirements under AMLA — CWC & ENG PLT
Articles & Resources
AMLA 6 min read·23 July 2026

Record-Keeping & Retention Requirements under AMLA

Section 17 of AMLA requires reporting institutions to keep records that let a transaction be reconstructed. Here is what to retain, for how long, and why it is the backbone of every investigation.

01

The record-keeping duty

Section 17 of AMLA requires reporting institutions to keep records of transactions and customer information. The governing principle from the FATF standards and BNM's policy document is simple: records must be sufficient to permit the reconstruction of individual transactions so that they can be used as evidence in prosecuting criminal activity.

02

What must be kept

Records span both the customer relationship and the transactions within it:

  • CDD records — identification and verification documents for customers and beneficial owners
  • Account files and business correspondence
  • Records of transactions, including amounts, currencies, dates and parties
  • Results of any analysis undertaken (for example, assessing a complex or unusual transaction)
  • Copies of reports made to the authorities and the supporting materials
  • Records of the compliance officer's decisions, including reasoned decisions not to file an STR
03

How long to retain

Records must be retained for at least the period required by AMLA and the applicable policy documents — generally measured from the completion of the transaction or the end of the business relationship. Where records relate to an ongoing investigation or a reported matter, they should be retained until the authorities confirm the matter is closed.

Retrievability matters as much as retentionRecords must be kept in a form that allows them to be retrieved and made available to the authorities swiftly. Data that exists but cannot be produced on request fails the purpose of the obligation.
04

Why it is the backbone of enforcement

Record-keeping is not administrative housekeeping — it is what makes an investigation possible. When law enforcement traces proceeds of unlawful activity, the institution's records are the evidential chain. Poor records mean an investigation stalls, and the institution itself may be found to have breached its statutory duty.

05

Good practice

  • A retention schedule mapped to each record type and the statutory minimum
  • Secure storage with access controls and integrity protection
  • The ability to link a customer to all their transactions and reports
  • Retention holds for records connected to investigations or filed reports
  • Periodic testing that archived records can actually be retrieved
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

CDD and beneficial-ownership records, account files and correspondence, transaction records, analysis of unusual transactions, copies of reports filed, and the compliance officer's decisions — sufficient to reconstruct individual transactions.
For at least the statutory minimum under AMLA and the applicable policy documents, generally measured from completion of the transaction or end of the relationship — and longer where a matter is under investigation.
No. Records must be retrievable and capable of being produced to the authorities swiftly. Data that cannot be produced on request does not satisfy the obligation.
Yes. The compliance officer's reasoned decision not to file, together with supporting documents, should be documented and retained.

In conclusion

Record-keeping is the least glamorous AML/CFT pillar and the one investigators rely on most. Retain the right records, for the right period, in a form you can actually produce — and test that you can.

AMLA · AML/CFT Advisory

Confident your records would survive a review?

Our independent AML/CFT reviews test whether your record-keeping meets AMLA's reconstruction standard.

Request a consultation